The previous version ended up as a reply to something inappropriate.
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content. Please take a look at it and tell me if you think the content is useful and how it could be improved.
None of the analysis of the file content is in place. I plan to start with analysis of the '.spec' files. That should make some of the information on the API available.
- Max
On 09/15/2010 03:32 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content.
Well, to be frank, I don't like the structure. Doxygen is able to produce colored and well structured pages but it's not perfect. Personally, I prefer something like this [1] and this [2] for the detail. I know frames are something awful but in this case, this is quite handy.
But it's just my thoughts. I hope you'll get more feedback.
Many thanks for your efforts --- (I bookmarked the [1] some years ago so ignore the deprecated "1.5.0")
[1]: http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/ [2]: http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/applet/AppletContext.h...
On 15 September 2010 15:25, GOUJON Alexandre ale.goujon@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/15/2010 03:32 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content.
Well, to be frank, I don't like the structure. Doxygen is able to produce colored and well structured pages but it's not perfect. Personally, I prefer something like this [1] and this [2] for the detail. I know frames are something awful but in this case, this is quite handy.
But it's just my thoughts. I hope you'll get more feedback.
Many thanks for your efforts
(I bookmarked the [1] some years ago so ignore the deprecated "1.5.0")
The Qt documentation is also very good in terms of layout and content. IIUC, they use Doxygen for most (all?) of the documentation.
- Reece
On 09/15/2010 10:25 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
On 09/15/2010 03:32 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content.
Well, to be frank, I don't like the structure. Doxygen is able to produce colored and well structured pages but it's not perfect. Personally, I prefer something like this [1] and this [2] for the detail. I know frames are something awful but in this case, this is quite handy.
But it's just my thoughts. I hope you'll get more feedback.
Many thanks for your efforts
(I bookmarked the [1] some years ago so ignore the deprecated "1.5.0")
Nice examples...
I'm not sure it would be practical to do that with the way Sourceforge has its standard MediaWiki app configured, and frankly I've not gotten around to figuring out how to install and configure MediaWiki de novo.
Another problem is getting the descriptive information. I know a way to do it, but it would put a hell of a load on the Sourceforge server. It would also be very evil to edit. With several hundred directories to scan, I'm not sure the extra effort to add it to the top level directory analysis pages is going to be useful. I wanted to direct that effort to the working directory pages.
- Max
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
The previous version ended up as a reply to something inappropriate.
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content. Please take a look at it and tell me if you think the content is useful and how it could be improved.
The first thing is that it requires a SourceForge login which is just wrong for what's supposed to be a public resource. Hopefully that's temporary but it's likely to limit who can comment on it.
I don't see the point of creating one page for every single Wine source file. That makes the WineAPI website very very Wine-specific and duplicates GitWeb functionality. My understanding is that this is supposed to provide documentation about the Windows APIs in a more open, collaborative and long-term way than MSDN. People who come for the documentation won't care whether CreateFile is implemented in file.c or kernel_main.c and that Wine has a Makefile.in file or an nls subfolder.
On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
The previous version ended up as a reply to something inappropriate.
The wiki at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php now has pages for the directories in the Wine Repository with classifications of the directory content. Please take a look at it and tell me if you think the content is useful and how it could be improved.
The first thing is that it requires a SourceForge login which is just wrong for what's supposed to be a public resource. Hopefully that's temporary but it's likely to limit who can comment on it.
Actually, that was a mistake on my part. If you use: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php you can skip the login.
I don't see the point of creating one page for every single Wine source file. That makes the WineAPI website very very Wine-specific and duplicates GitWeb functionality. My understanding is that this is supposed to provide documentation about the Windows APIs in a more open, collaborative and long-term way than MSDN. People who come for the documentation won't care whether CreateFile is implemented in file.c or kernel_main.c and that Wine has a Makefile.in file or an nls subfolder.
A little off point, but it points up an alternative. The process of scanning the repository is all I have in place at this point and I really should label the pages generated so far as Wine specific. That way other projects could produce similar pages specific to their structure. There is not a page for every file, only those that I intend to analyze. If I don't plan to analyze it, I simply provide a link to the file in the repository.
I have *not* gotten started on the extraction of the API information. I plan to label each page of that type with an 'API/' prefix so that it would be common to multiple projects. I needed to get the framework in place so that I could the results where it will be possible to find them. Now that is done, the real work begins...
- Max
On 09/15/2010 10:47 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
Actually, that was a mistake on my part. If you use: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php you can skip the login.
ARGH! Make that: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wineapi/index.php
- Max
-
Francois Gouget -
GOUJON Alexandre -
Max TenEyck Woodbury -
Reece Dunn