On 19/08/2011 03:14, Dan Kegel wrote:
Hi Nowres, it's awesome that you're digging into cmd like this!
The rule with Wine is that Each patch you submit shall pass tests.
That means that your patch series [1/2] cmd: fixing an error with redirection operators [2/2] cmd/tests: fixing an error with redirection operators (updating test results)
is incorrect, since tests marked todo_wine will fail after the first patch.
Better to send things like that as a single merged patch in the future.
Thanks, Dan
Ok Dan,
i queued these patch in my email client, but when I sent them they were sent in bad order.
Nowres,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Nowres Rafid nowres.rafed@gmail.com wrote:
That means that your patch series [1/2] cmd: fixing an error with redirection operators [2/2] cmd/tests: fixing an error with redirection operators (updating test results)
is incorrect, since tests marked todo_wine will fail after the first patch.
i queued these patch in my email client, but when I sent them they were sent in bad order.
It doesn't matter what order they were sent in, I think. There's no way that applying one of those patches would yield working tests.
If you want to do a two patch series, you can, but every patch in the series has to pass tests on its own. That may mean sending new tests first with extra todo's, then removing the todo's in the second patch which fixes them.
In this case, you weren't adding any new tests, so there's no first test patch in the series; you really should just send a single merged patch. - Dan