Re: [PATCH 07/12] server: Introduce default async queue that's used if async is not explicitly queued in fd op.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Jacek Caban  writes:
> Although (at least now) all read and write implementations always queue
> async on success, it's not the case for ioctl. I think we should allow
> simple ioctls without pending results to not care about explicitly
> handling async objects, but those still need a queued async for proper
> result reporting. We currently don't set events, queue APCs nor send
> completion for them.
>
> My initial thought was to make async object work better without
> associated queue, but that leads to problems with references from an
> async to fd.

I think that would be better than creating a dummy queue.