I sent this patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done something wrong or what?
On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
I sent this patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done something wrong or what?
Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches. For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch, if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest you do the same.
Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
I sent this patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done something wrong or what?
Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches. For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch, if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest you do the same.
Yea, I do LostWages: I think he just gives the patches a little time incase someone has a objection.. And I think that is a good idea.
Tom
Yes, I'm very behind on the patches for the website. I do scan the wine-patches list for anything that looks like a website patch. But putting either WineHQ, Website, or Lostwages in the title will save me some some. Certain people I commit immediately (how do you get on this list? submit a few good patches ;) ), others I do wait at least a day or so for someone to object to the patch. I don't comment myself much, not usually opinionated on anything submitted.
I working on a complete revamp of the entire CodeWeavers website right now. That is eating up 100% of my focus. I usually will not submit patches unless I am actually at my desk at work. I have made some exceptions, WWN issues and Wine releases.
Ivan, your patch should go in tomorrow. Assuming something does not blow up at the office and my attention gets diverted. note to self: need less volatile chemicals at the office.
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 08:44, Tom wrote:
Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
I sent this patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done something wrong or what?
Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches. For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch, if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest you do the same.
Yea, I do LostWages: I think he just gives the patches a little time incase someone has a objection.. And I think that is a good idea.
Tom
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith -
Jeremy Newman -
Tom