Re: msvcp90/tests: Skip tests on missing functions

[Piotr Caban]

On 08/06/13 23:00, André Hentschel wrote:
> @@ -749,6 +749,13 @@ static BOOL init(void)
>       SET(p_basic_istream_char_read_uint64,
>           "??5?$basic_istream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@QAEAAV01@AA_K@Z");
> -
> -
>    if (!p_basic_istream_char_read_uint64)
> -
>    {
> -
>        skip("_basic_istream_char_read_uint64 not found, skipping tests\n");
> -
>        return FALSE;
> -
>    }

Why are you skipping the tests instead of properly initializing 
functions pointers on ARM?

msvcp90/tests: Skip tests on missing functions

[André Hentschel]

Am 07.08.2013 10:27, schrieb Piotr Caban:
> On 08/06/13 23:00, André Hentschel wrote:
> > @@ -749,6 +749,13 @@ static BOOL init(void)
> >       SET(p_basic_istream_char_read_uint64,
> >           "??5?$basic_istream@DU?$char_traits@D@std@@@std@@QAEAAV01@AA_K@Z");
> > -
> > -
> >    if (!p_basic_istream_char_read_uint64)
> > -
> >    {
> > -
> >        skip("_basic_istream_char_read_uint64 not found, skipping tests\n");
> > -
> >        return FALSE;
> > -
> >    }
>
> Why are you skipping the tests instead of properly initializing functions pointers on ARM?

Oops, not sure, most likely it was too late and i was in the "skip-mode" because of msvcr90...
I'll send a new one