"György 'Nog' Jeney" nog@sdf.lonestar.org writes:
Is there any reason why this patch has not been applied? This is essentially the same as my dosconf try 3 patch but for your convinience I made a new diff against the current cvs.
It's really ugly to export the DOSCONF structure as part of the DOS module interface. I think it's better to wait until that stuff can be moved without having to export it.
"György 'Nog' Jeney" nog@sdf.lonestar.org writes:
Is there any reason why this patch has not been applied? This is essentially the same as my dosconf try 3 patch but for your convinience I made a new diff against the current cvs.
It's really ugly to export the DOSCONF structure as part of the DOS module interface. I think it's better to wait until that stuff can be moved without having to export it.
This uglyness doesnt haveto stay around for to long as this patch was to split up my patches a bit for my int21 move for which I have posted a patch already. Is there any reason why THAT one has not been applied?
BTW Im very sorry for sending 3 e-mails but my squirelmail/internet connection just doesnt work well. I have to push the stop button on my browser to stop sending the mail over and over again. This time I got the timeing wrong as I was having a Voip conversation at the same time.
"György 'Nog' Jeney" nog@sdf.lonestar.org writes:
This uglyness doesnt haveto stay around for to long as this patch was to split up my patches a bit for my int21 move for which I have posted a patch already. Is there any reason why THAT one has not been applied?
I don't know, I haven't seen the full patch yet, all your submissions have been corrupted by your mailer. But if as I guess it requires exporting a bunch of internal functions from kernel then it won't go in without major work. I think it's much better to start moving the easy stuff first like Jukka has been doing.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
György 'Nog' Jeney