Insane git output

[Dan Kegel]

I did a git pull today, and saw this:

copy programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/resources.h (57%)
 copy {programs/clock => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests}/rsrc.rc (57%)
 create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/texture.c
 create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/util.c
 create mode 100644 dlls/msctf/compartmentmgr.c
 create mode 100644 dlls/oleacc/oleacc_De.rc
 create mode 100644 dlls/windowscodecs/Makefile.in
 rename programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/windowscodecs/main.c (57%)

Wha?  Those are some crazy renames/copies...

[Kai Blin]

On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:43:30 Dan Kegel wrote:
> I did a git pull today, and saw this:
>
> copy programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/resources.h (57%)
>  copy {programs/clock => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests}/rsrc.rc (57%)
>  create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/texture.c
>  create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/util.c
>  create mode 100644 dlls/msctf/compartmentmgr.c
>  create mode 100644 dlls/oleacc/oleacc_De.rc
>  create mode 100644 dlls/windowscodecs/Makefile.in
>  rename programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/windowscodecs/main.c (57%)
>
> Wha?  Those are some crazy renames/copies...

At least windowscodecs/main.c is a stub. So I take the LGPL license comment is 
the same. Git doesn't care about filenames much, and judges operations based 
on content. If the file's mostly the license header, it doesn't sound so 
insane to assume they're a copy (57% identical)

Cheers,
Kai