Request for test on at least one Windows box

[Juan Lang]

Hi all, could someone with the ability to build and run a test on
Windows run the attached test for me?  I have a fix for bug 19760, but
I'd just like to double check that it's correct before sending it in
(and I don't have access to Windows at the moment.)

Please copy the list on the reply so not too many people end up doing it.

Cheers,
--Juan

[Stefan Leichter]

Am Wednesday 19 August 2009 19:27:28 schrieb Juan Lang:
> Hi all, could someone with the ability to build and run a test on
> Windows run the attached test for me?  I have a fix for bug 19760, but
> I'd just like to double check that it's correct before sending it in
> (and I don't have access to Windows at the moment.)
>
> Please copy the list on the reply so not too many people end up doing it.
>
> Cheers,
> --Juan

Hi Juan,

i did not get an error.

Stefan

Windows 2000 / VMware Server2
------------------------------
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_np:\\VM-WIN2000
[\pipe\000001f8.000]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_ip_tcp:vm-win2000[1033]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncalrpc:VM-WIN2000[LRPC000001f8.00000001]
rpc_protseq: 40 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.

Windows XP / Intel P3
--------------------------------
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_np:\\VM-WIN2000
[\pipe\000001f8.000]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_ip_tcp:vm-win2000[1033]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncalrpc:VM-WIN2000[LRPC000001f8.00000001]
rpc_protseq: 40 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.

[Stefan Leichter]

Am Wednesday 19 August 2009 23:16:12 schrieb Stefan Leichter:
> Am Wednesday 19 August 2009 19:27:28 schrieb Juan Lang:
> > Hi all, could someone with the ability to build and run a test on
> > Windows run the attached test for me?  I have a fix for bug 19760, but
> > I'd just like to double check that it's correct before sending it in
> > (and I don't have access to Windows at the moment.)
> >
> > Please copy the list on the reply so not too many people end up doing it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --Juan
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> i did not get an error.
>
> Stefan
> Windows 2000 / VMware Server2
>
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_np:\\VM-WIN2000
> [\pipe\000001f8.000]
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_ip_tcp:vm-win2000[1033]
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncalrpc:VM-WIN2000[LRPC000001f8.00000001]
> rpc_protseq: 40 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.
> Windows XP / Intel P3
>
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_np:\\VM-WIN2000
> [\pipe\000001f8.000]
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_ip_tcp:vm-win2000[1033]
> rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncalrpc:VM-WIN2000[LRPC000001f8.00000001]
> rpc_protseq: 40 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.

The XP Log was wrong. This is the correct one

Windows XP / Intel P3
--------------------------------
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_np:\\SLEXPIDE[\pipe\00000740.000]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncacn_ip_tcp:slexpide[1035]
rpc_protseq.c:90: string binding: ncalrpc:SLEXPIDE[LRPC00000740.00000001]
rpc_protseq: 40 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.