On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:01:03 +0000, Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
Was there a problem with this one - Its really holding me up with progress, so I need to ensure I resolve any issues asap. Apologies if this is still in your list of patches to work through as I heard you have just moved
If the problem is source control related (as opposed to technical direction related) you may want to look at svk, which lets you branch CVS repositories into a local repository then commit to your branch. Unlike arch it doesn't require a gateway and it isn't hard to set up or use.
Hope that helps.
thanks -mike
Le lun 22/11/2004 à 17:54, Mike Hearn a écrit :
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:01:03 +0000, Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
Was there a problem with this one - Its really holding me up with progress, so I need to ensure I resolve any issues asap. Apologies if this is still in your list of patches to work through as I heard you have just moved
If the problem is source control related (as opposed to technical direction related) you may want to look at svk, which lets you branch CVS repositories into a local repository then commit to your branch. Unlike arch it doesn't require a gateway and it isn't hard to set up or use.
IIRC, it's more of a technical direction nature. Jason doesn't want to do those kind of refcounting changes twice, so he's waiting on a proper procedure before continuing for the rest.
Vincent
-
Mike Hearn -
Vincent Béron