I was curious how we did last year so I dug up some numbers with the help of git. I counted patches applied to the tree starting from 1999:
year # patches
1999 2656 2000 2722 2001 1885 2002 3094 2003 3283 2004 3851 2005 6037
Total: 23528
This is almost too good to be true isn't it? I worried for a while that these figures might be influenced by the switch from cvs to git, e.g. that cvs history somehow shows up compressed in git. On second look though it really seems that the past year has seen an impressive increase in productivity, compared to the previous years.
-Hans
Hans Leidekker wrote:
I was curious how we did last year so I dug up some numbers with the help of git. I counted patches applied to the tree starting from 1999:
year # patches
1999 2656 2000 2722 2001 1885 2002 3094 2003 3283 2004 3851 2005 6037
Total: 23528
This is almost too good to be true isn't it? I worried for a while that these figures might be influenced by the switch from cvs to git, e.g. that cvs history somehow shows up compressed in git. On second
You can crosscheck the numbers with the numbers from the wine-cvs mailing list archives http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/ which go back to february 2001. Though those numbers contain also lostwages, appdb, tools and now documentation commits.
look though it really seems that the past year has seen an impressive increase in productivity, compared to the previous years.
bye michael
-
Hans Leidekker -
Michael Stefaniuc