https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52975
Signed-off-by: Louis Lenders xerox.xerox2000x@gmail.com --- dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc | 3 +++ dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest
diff --git a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc index 458c5df6f98..2d9f5457569 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc +++ b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc @@ -20,3 +20,6 @@
/* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ WINE_MANIFEST 24 msvcr80.manifest + +/* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ +WINE_MANIFEST61 24 msvcr80_61.manifest diff --git a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4298d242046 --- /dev/null +++ b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> +<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0"> + <assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="Microsoft.VC80.CRT" version="8.0.50727.6195" processorArchitecture="" publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b"/> + <file name="msvcr80.dll"/> + <file name="msvcp80.dll"/> + <file name="msvcm80.dll"/> +</assembly>
Hi Louis,
On 9 May 2022, at 11:30, Louis Lenders xerox.xerox2000x@gmail.com wrote: /* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ WINE_MANIFEST 24 msvcr80.manifest
+/* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ +WINE_MANIFEST61 24 msvcr80_61.manifest
Is there a reason for not updating the version in current manifest file?
Thanks, Piotr
Hi Piotr,
Is there a reason for not updating the version in current manifest file?
I just noticed that for gdiplus there were different versions living side by side in winsxs, and I thought that was the way to go? I don`t have enough knowledge of this stuff so if you could give answer what way to go it`d be nice Regards
Op ma 9 mei 2022 om 11:30 schreef Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x@gmail.com
:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52975
Signed-off-by: Louis Lenders xerox.xerox2000x@gmail.com
dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc | 3 +++ dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest
diff --git a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc index 458c5df6f98..2d9f5457569 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc +++ b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80.rc @@ -20,3 +20,6 @@
/* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ WINE_MANIFEST 24 msvcr80.manifest
+/* @makedep: msvcr80.manifest */ +WINE_MANIFEST61 24 msvcr80_61.manifest diff --git a/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4298d242046 --- /dev/null +++ b/dlls/msvcr80/msvcr80_61.manifest @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> +<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
- <assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="Microsoft.VC80.CRT"
version="8.0.50727.6195" processorArchitecture="" publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b"/>
<file name="msvcr80.dll"/>
<file name="msvcp80.dll"/>
<file name="msvcm80.dll"/>
+</assembly>
2.36.0
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=114396
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (build log) ===
Task: Patch failed to apply
=== debian11 (build log) ===
Task: Patch failed to apply
Hi Louis,
On 5/10/22 16:06, Louis Lenders wrote:
Hi Piotr,
Is there a reason for not updating the version in current manifest file?
I just noticed that for gdiplus there were different versions living side by side in winsxs, and I thought that was the way to go? I don`t have enough knowledge of this stuff so if you could give answer what way to go it`d be nice
In case of msvcr80 there's no need for multiple manifest files (newer versions are supposed to be backwards compatible). The newest version I have installed on my system is 8.0.50727.9672. Please update it to this version.
Thanks, Piotr