Re: dumping utility

[Alexandre Julliard]

eric pouech  writes:
> I choose the later because I didn't like to have a dump utility
> named specmaker...  however, we can go back to the former, and go
> for another name ;-)

I think that may be better. And a name starting in 'wine' would be
better than specmaker anyway, this would make sure we don't conflict
with other projects.

dumping utility

[Marcus Meissner]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:00:49AM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> eric pouech  writes:
> > I choose the later because I didn't like to have a dump utility
> > named specmaker...  however, we can go back to the former, and go
> > for another name ;-)
>
> I think that may be better. And a name starting in 'wine' would be
> better than specmaker anyway, this would make sure we don't conflict
> with other projects.

Actually for Caldera I am already putting all non-user called programs
(wineserver,winedbg,wineshelllink, and dosmod) into /usr/lib/wine.

In /usr/bin/ is also left 'wine' (a shell wrapper to a helper program and
the real binary in /usr/lib/wine/) and regapi/regapi.so.

Ciao, Marcus

dumping utility

[eric pouech]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> eric pouech  writes:
> > I choose the later because I didn't like to have a dump utility
> > named specmaker...  however, we can go back to the former, and go
> > for another name ;-)
>
> I think that may be better. And a name starting in 'wine' would be
> better than specmaker anyway, this would make sure we don't conflict
> with other projects.

what about winextract ?

A+