Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

[Dan Kegel]

wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708

Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes,
or skipping wine-1.1.12.

Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

[Marcus Meissner]

On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:11:23AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
>
> Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes,
> or skipping wine-1.1.12.

I picked two fixes now, the third bug seems to be a dup of
the debugger fix.

d2c4ff23057c38547434d893272afd3e4e8a2b45
9087e5c55f35e091c5cb9ba381e0a5020d1fc0ad

openSUSE 1.1.12 builds rebuilding right as we speak ;)

Ciao, Marcus

Packagers: consider not packaging wine-1.1.12, or cherrypicking fixes

[Scott Ritchie]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
>
> Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes,
> or skipping wine-1.1.12.

1.1.11 had a handful of regressions as well.  Ironically for a game I
play 1.1.12 fixed one introduced in 1.1.11.

I have a theory that our releases have just as many regressions as
before, we're just noticing them quicker due to our larger user base.

Thanks,
Scott Ritchie