On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Reece Dunn msclrhd@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
This fixes the todo blocks in the SetWindowTheme tests.
Changes: v2 -- initialise the hr variable so that it is initialised in the case where hwnd is a valid window handle.
Please fix your changelog entry to describe the *fix*, not the end result (getting rid of todo_wine's). Also,
+ HRESULT hr = S_OK; TRACE("(%p,%s,%s)\n", hwnd, debugstr_w(pszSubAppName), debugstr_w(pszSubIdList)); - hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName); + if(!IsWindow(hwnd)) + hr = E_HANDLE; + if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) + hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName); if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubIdList, pszSubIdList); if(SUCCEEDED(hr))
This code is screaming for a goto.
2008/10/28 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com:
- HRESULT hr = S_OK; TRACE("(%p,%s,%s)\n", hwnd, debugstr_w(pszSubAppName), debugstr_w(pszSubIdList));
- hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName);
- if(!IsWindow(hwnd))
hr = E_HANDLE;
- if(SUCCEEDED(hr))
if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubIdList, pszSubIdList); if(SUCCEEDED(hr))hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName);
This code is screaming for a goto.
I disagree.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Rob Shearman robertshearman@gmail.com wrote:
2008/10/28 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com:
- HRESULT hr = S_OK; TRACE("(%p,%s,%s)\n", hwnd, debugstr_w(pszSubAppName), debugstr_w(pszSubIdList));
- hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName);
- if(!IsWindow(hwnd))
hr = E_HANDLE;
- if(SUCCEEDED(hr))
if(SUCCEEDED(hr)) hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubIdList, pszSubIdList); if(SUCCEEDED(hr))hr = UXTHEME_SetWindowProperty(hwnd, atSubAppName, pszSubAppName);
This code is screaming for a goto.
I disagree.
Yes, it was late and my mind stopped after the next thought. There's nothing to clean up, so simply returning the failed result is optimal.
2008/10/28 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Rob Shearman robertshearman@gmail.com wrote:
2008/10/28 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com:
This code is screaming for a goto.
I disagree.
Yes, it was late and my mind stopped after the next thought. There's nothing to clean up, so simply returning the failed result is optimal.
Ok, so I will use this version of the code but will hunt down where the hwnd is being used, as per Alexandre's comments. I'll send a revised patch later on today or tomorrow.
Thanks, - Reece