Re: [advapi32/service] Test for duplicate displayname

[James Hawkins]

On 7/17/07, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another test that shows that windows checks if the displayname already exists.
>
> Changelog
>     Test for duplicate displayname
>
> Cheers,

+    /* To find an existing displayname we check the 'Spooler'
service. Although the registry doesn't show DisplayName on NT4, this
call

That's a really long comment at 136 cols.  There are other really long
lines in the rest of the patch too.

[advapi32/service] Test for duplicate displayname

[Paul Vriens]

James Hawkins wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another test that shows that windows checks if the displayname already 
> > exists.
> >
> > Changelog
> >     Test for duplicate displayname
> >
> > Cheers,
> - /* To find an existing displayname we check the 'Spooler'
>
> service. Although the registry doesn't show DisplayName on NT4, this
> call
>
> That's a really long comment at 136 cols.  There are other really long
> lines in the rest of the patch too.

Hi James,

I already thought about that. I'll produce a cleanup patch first before 
introducing new stuff (just have to wait if this one will be committed or not).

Cheers,

Paul.

[advapi32/service] Test for duplicate displayname

[Paul Vriens]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > On 7/17/07, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Another test that shows that windows checks if the displayname 
> > > already exists.
> > >
> > > Changelog
> > >     Test for duplicate displayname
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > - /* To find an existing displayname we check the 'Spooler'
> >
> > service. Although the registry doesn't show DisplayName on NT4, this
> > call
> >
> > That's a really long comment at 136 cols.  There are other really long
> > lines in the rest of the patch too.
>
> Hi James,
>
> I already thought about that. I'll produce a cleanup patch first before 
> introducing new stuff (just have to wait if this one will be committed 
> or not).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.

Just a question, what would be a good 'cutting' point? (80 chars? , 128 ?)

Cheers,

Paul.

[advapi32/service] Test for duplicate displayname

[James Hawkins]

On 7/18/07, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
> > James Hawkins wrote:
> > > On 7/17/07, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Another test that shows that windows checks if the displayname
> > > > already exists.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog
> > > >     Test for duplicate displayname
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > - /* To find an existing displayname we check the 'Spooler'
> > >
> > > service. Although the registry doesn't show DisplayName on NT4, this
> > > call
> > >
> > > That's a really long comment at 136 cols.  There are other really long
> > > lines in the rest of the patch too.
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I already thought about that. I'll produce a cleanup patch first before
> > introducing new stuff (just have to wait if this one will be committed
> > or not).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
>
> Just a question, what would be a good 'cutting' point? (80 chars? , 128 ?)

80 is pretty standard in Wine, though the occasional line is a little
bit longer, but not by much, and usually only because it would be hard
to read if the line were split up.