Andrew Talbot wrote:
- if( n < 0 )
- if( (LONG)n < 0 )
Why not change the type of n to LONG rather than using a cast?
Mike
Mike McCormack wrote:
Andrew Talbot wrote:
- if( n < 0 )
- if( (LONG)n < 0 )
Why not change the type of n to LONG rather than using a cast?
Mike
Hi Mike,
Long answer (no pun intended):
There were two ways to jump: I could either have, as you say, made n long, so it could accept negative values, or kept it unsigned and used a cast. I thought about K & R and character-reading functions taking intS, because of EOF. But I decided that that was because EOF was a 'legitimate' value; whereas, in this case, n was inherently a positive commodity and would go negative only in the case of an error condition.
Short answer:
OK, I'll resubmit using LONGs. Thanks for taking an interest.
-- Andy.