Hi.
While reading the List, I found a Transfer-Problem:
Mails are send once (same ID), get doubled on the Path and arrived twice.
And Mysterious: Only one Version is in the Archiv!
------- cut -----
Example 1: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039849.html
One Version:
Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuZm-0006Ev-KU for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:42:41 -0500
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx115.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.174.27]) by lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j877XlRN027997; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:33:47 +0200
Other Version: Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuUQ-0005j4-6t for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:37:08 -0500
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx115.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.174.27]) by lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j877XlRN027997; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:33:47 +0200
------- cut -----
Example 2: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039862.html
One Version:
Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qr-TC for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:36 -0500
Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000
Other Version:
Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qq-Rc for wine-devel@winehq.com; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000
------- cut -----
What's wrong ?
Wednesday, September 7, 2005, 12:02:54 PM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Hi. While reading the List, I found a Transfer-Problem: Mails are send once (same ID), get doubled on the Path and arrived twice. And Mysterious: Only one Version is in the Archiv! ------- cut ----- Example 2: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039862.html One Version: Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qr-TC for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:36 -0500 Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000 Other Version: Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qq-Rc for wine-devel@winehq.com; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000
You can discount this one, because that was my mistake - had wine-devel@winehq.com twice in TO: field
Vitaliy.
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 12:21 -0600 schrieb Vitaliy Margolen:
You can discount this one, because that was my mistake - had wine-devel@winehq.com twice in TO: field
Thanks. I test this.
Just did a quick scan of the mail log, our server is only sending one email per list subscriber. I have not personally witnessed any duplication myself as I also subscribe to these lists.
This is a new one to me. I thought maybe you were subscribed to the list twice, but I checked that as well. Though, that would not explain the same mail ids you see.
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 20:02 +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Hi.
While reading the List, I found a Transfer-Problem:
Mails are send once (same ID), get doubled on the Path and arrived twice.
And Mysterious: Only one Version is in the Archiv!
------- cut -----
Example 1: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039849.html
One Version:
Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuZm-0006Ev-KU for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:42:41 -0500
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx115.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.174.27]) by lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j877XlRN027997; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:33:47 +0200
Other Version: Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuUQ-0005j4-6t for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:37:08 -0500
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (lnx115.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.174.27]) by lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j877XlRN027997; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:33:47 +0200
------- cut -----
Example 2: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-September/039862.html
One Version:
Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qr-TC for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:36 -0500
Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000
Other Version:
Received: from sgi2.kievinfo.com ([65.100.132.146]) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ED10P-0008Qq-Rc for wine-devel@winehq.com; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 09:34:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 89); 7 Sep 2005 14:34:16 -0000
------- cut -----
What's wrong ?
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 13:33 -0500 schrieb Jeremy Newman:
Just did a quick scan of the mail log, our server is only sending one email per list subscriber.
I want to mention, that the Message has one ID / Time when started, ...
Received: from mailserver3.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de
(lnx115.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.174.27]) by lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j877XlRN027997; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:33:47 +0200
... and 2 different IDs / Times when wine.codeweavers.com is listed first:
One Version:
Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuZm-0006Ev-KU for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:42:41 -0500
Other Version:
Received: from lnx131.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.174.25] ident=root) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ECuUQ-0005j4-6t for wine-devel@winehq.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 02:37:08 -0500
So, from my Mailclients view, these are 2 different Mail's, but only one was send to "wine-devel@winehq.org".
That's not normal IMHO.