I am thinking about some netapi32 improvements where I'd need to call the functions of the getpw/getgr family: getpwnam(), getpwent(), getgrent(), etc.
Configure checks for the "pwd.h" header and getpwuid(). Must I add more checks for all the functions I use, or is it ok to assume that getpwuid() presence implies getpwnam() presence?
Martin
Martin Wilck wrote:
I am thinking about some netapi32 improvements where I'd need to call the functions of the getpw/getgr family: getpwnam(), getpwent(), getgrent(), etc.
Configure checks for the "pwd.h" header and getpwuid(). Must I add more checks for all the functions I use, or is it ok to assume that getpwuid() presence implies getpwnam() presence?
Martin
Maybe you should at least check for "grp.h" and getgrent etc in a separate check, since they are in a separate header file ... although "pwd.h" might imply the existence of "grp.h", it could make errors if it didn't harder to work out if there wasn't a separate configure check.
David
Maybe you should at least check for "grp.h" and getgrent etc in a separate check, since they are in a separate header file ... although "pwd.h" might imply the existence of "grp.h", it could make errors if it didn't harder to work out if there wasn't a separate configure check.
Yeah, I figured that, too. Thanks, Martin
-
David Fraser -
Martin Wilck