On Do, 2009-06-11 at 11:16 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
- "expand [-r] source destination\n"
- "expand -r source [destination]\n"
- "expand -D source.cab [-F:Files]\n"
- "expand source.cab -F:files destination\n"
- "\n"
- " -r Rename expanded files.\n"
- " If the -r option is given to a cabinet
containing multiple\n"
- " files, the call will fail.\n"
- " -D Display list of files in source.\n"
- " (This option is currently unimplemented)\n"
- " source Source file specification. Wildcards may be
used.\n"
- " -F:Files Name of files to expand from a .CAB.\n"
- " (This option is currently unimplemented)\n"
- " Destination Destination file | path specification.\n"
- " Destination may be a directory.\n"
- " If Source is multiple files and -r is not
specified,\n"
- " Destination must be a directory.\n"
Mixing the case looks strange. (Files/files, Destination/destination)
Please move the helpmsg to a resource, to make translations possible.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Detlef Riekenbergwine.dev@web.de wrote:
Mixing the case looks strange. (Files/files, Destination/destination)
Please move the helpmsg to a resource, to make translations possible.
I already told Alexandre to ignore my spam on the account of it does not properly stub the unimplemented functions anyway and I agree it should use the resources. I was hoping when I looked at it that adding the case for multiple cabinet files would be less of a hassle...