Re: Reproducible builds

> Od: Stefan Dösinger
>
> Am 2017-02-19 um 10:00 schrieb [e-mail]:
> > Anyway, there are 7 files out of 2750 which _always_ pickup some random
> > value and use that consistently. Why are these libraries built
> > inconsitently? Is that intentional? An example is attached.
>
> Have you looked at the .o files of those libraries? Finding the .c file
> that introduces the difference might give some hints to pin down the
> problem.

Thanks. These "random" value come from:

* olepro_t.res
 * std_ole_v2_t.res
 * wuapi_tlb_t.res

Anyway, all the other folders also have *.res files. Can these 3 be "fixed"
so that they behave like the rest of dll-folders? Or can i pass some kind
of parameter or switch?

Thank you!
W.

Reproducible builds

[Marcus Meissner]

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 05:36:30PM +0100, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Od: Stefan Dösinger
> >
> > Am 2017-02-19 um 10:00 schrieb [e-mail]:
> > > Anyway, there are 7 files out of 2750 which _always_ pickup some random
> > > value and use that consistently. Why are these libraries built
> > > inconsitently? Is that intentional? An example is attached.
> >
> > Have you looked at the .o files of those libraries? Finding the .c file
> > that introduces the difference might give some hints to pin down the
> > problem.
>
> Thanks. These "random" value come from:
> - olepro_t.res
> - std_ole_v2_t.res
> - wuapi_tlb_t.res
>
> Anyway, all the other folders also have *.res files. Can these 3 be "fixed"
> so that they behave like the rest of dll-folders? Or can i pass some kind
> of parameter or switch?

std_ole_v2_t.res always comes out the same for me, in 32 and 64bit builds
when I set WIDL_TIME_OVERRIDE="0".

Same for olepro_t.res

(current git state)

Ciao, Marcus