Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com wrote:
@@ -259,7 +278,7 @@ static DWORD METAFILE_AddObjectId(GpMetafile *metafile) id = 0; for (i=1; i<sizeof(metafile->objects_table)/sizeof(metafile->objects_table[0]); i++) {
if (metafile->objects_table[id] < metafile->objects_table[i])
if (metafile->objects_table[id] > metafile->objects_table[i])
This looks strange to change this right in the next patch.
On 06/30/17 16:11, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com wrote:
@@ -259,7 +278,7 @@ static DWORD METAFILE_AddObjectId(GpMetafile *metafile) id = 0; for (i=1; i<sizeof(metafile->objects_table)/sizeof(metafile->objects_table[0]); i++) {
if (metafile->objects_table[id] < metafile->objects_table[i])
if (metafile->objects_table[id] > metafile->objects_table[i])
This looks strange to change this right in the next patch.
I've made a mistake while rebasing the patches. Thanks for catching it.
Thanks, Piotr