Hello,
most potential WINE users already own a Windows CD. This is obvious because if you want to run a Windows program on Linux it is because you are probably already using it, and this means you have Windows installed somewhere.
Now, if I have the Windows CD I can copy all the needed DLLs(and whatever else) to the correct Directory. Now my question how well does WINE run if you follow this approach? If Wine doesn't work 100% doing it this way, I think this should be the main focus, because after this works, it will be just a question of time till we replace all DLLs with our own ones, one at a time.
What about DirectX? Can we use those DLLs? I suppose they need Windows drivers so they might not work with Linux. But would it be possible to make the Windows drivers work on Linux so that DirectX would run?
I think this would be a good intermediary goal, especially for all those companies wanting to switch from Windows to Linux because they already have Windows CDs.
Roland
At 09:06 AM 6/24/02 -0300, Roland wrote:
<snip>
Hello, did I ask the wrong question? I read the manual and it says that only a few basic dlls need to be implemented. For the other we can use the windows dlls. So I think my question makes sense. Is there a particular reason why no one wants to answer it?
Sorry for taking your time, Roland
Roland wrote:
At 09:06 AM 6/24/02 -0300, Roland wrote:
<snip>
Hello, did I ask the wrong question? I read the manual and it says that only a few basic dlls need to be implemented. For the other we can use the windows dlls. So I think my question makes sense. Is there a particular reason why no one wants to answer it?
Sorry for taking your time, Roland
As far as I know the biggest obstacle for this is DLL separation.
Tony Lambregts