I was sitting in a sitting room, Toying with some toys, When from a room marked Gruesome, There came a gruesome noise.
I've been "toying" with an automatic regression testing system over the past month or so. The results can be seen at:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/
Currently its only using the Perl framework, which doesn't test too much at the moment. Hopefully this will change soon.
Comments gratefully received (and any criticisms too, I guess;)
Cheers,
Paul.
--- Paul Millar paulm@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
I've been "toying" with an automatic regression testing system over the past month or so. The results can be seen at:
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/
Currently its only using the Perl framework, which doesn't test too much at the moment. Hopefully this will change soon.
Looks good. I don't know if we need this information online. However, having the automated tests and mailing wine-devel in case something breaks is, probably a good idea.
Andriy Palamarchuk
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Andriy Palamarchuk wrote:
--- Paul Millar paulm@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Looks good. I don't know if we need this information online.
True.
We could get away with just an email when something broke, but the web interface is supposed to provide a more elegant way of discovering what went wrong.
There's quite a lot of information in the raw data (it can easily be over 300k). Obviously I couldn't send that to wine-devel: I would have to trim it down. The web interface should allow people to select the important information and ignore the rest.
There's also links to cvsweb and patch information, so figuring out which change caused the regression should be easy (fixing it might not be, though ;)
However, having the automated tests and mailing wine-devel in case something breaks is, probably a good idea.
Yep, emailing wine-devel sounds like a good idea.
What information would be useful?
I think the minimum is a list of applied patches, the tests that broke and a link to the buildinfo web page.
Paul.
--- Paul Millar paulm@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
However, having the automated tests and mailing wine-devel in case something breaks is, probably a good idea.
Yep, emailing wine-devel sounds like a good idea.
What information would be useful?
I think the minimum is a list of applied patches, the tests that broke and a link to the buildinfo web page.
Right, and the email should be sent only when something is broken.
Andriy
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/