Merge rpcrt/ole32 from Rewind

Hi!

I started to merge this files in. This patches are done to a loder wine version so it does not merge in a clean way. Some code is allready implemented twice.
So I do:
- merge as far as I can
- if a function is implemented twice I comment one implementation out but leave the code in (mainly the standard marshaler parts). I can't decide how to merge it.
- the final cleanup should be done by the ones who are familiar with that code (Marcus?)
- any objections against the rpcrt4 stuff? Ove himself says its not very clean but we dont have any better code yet.

Is this OK?

juergen

[Alexandre Julliard]

[e-mail] writes:
> I started to merge this files in. This patches are done to a loder wine version so it does not merge in a clean way. Some code is allready implemented twice.
> So I do:
> - merge as far as I can
> - if a function is implemented twice I comment one implementation out but leave the code in (mainly the standard marshaler parts). I can't decide how to merge it.

That's not a merge, that's just copying code around. If you don't know
how to merge that stuff properly, please leave it for someone else like
Marcus.
> - the final cleanup should be done by the ones who are familiar with that code (Marcus?)
> - any objections against the rpcrt4 stuff? Ove himself says its not very clean but we dont have any better code yet.

I don't know, I haven't seen the patch, it seems the sourceforge
archives don't store large mails. Could you please forward it to me?

[Jürgen Schmied]

> > I started to merge this files in. This patches are done to a loder wine version so it does not merge in a clean way. Some code is allready implemented twice.
> > So I do:
> > - merge as far as I can
> > - if a function is implemented twice I comment one implementation out but leave the code in (mainly the standard marshaler parts). I can't decide how to merge it.
>
> That's not a merge, that's just copying code around. If you don't know
> how to merge that stuff properly, please leave it for someone else like
> Marcus.

No, the most things I can merge properly but I don't like to decide what implementation 
of the standard marshaler is better. I can copy Ove's one in a extra file and send it 
together with the patch so someone else (MM) can merge this part.
> > - the final cleanup should be done by the ones who are familiar with that code (Marcus?)
> > - any objections against the rpcrt4 stuff? Ove himself says its not very clean but we dont have any better code yet.
>
> I don't know, I haven't seen the patch, it seems the sourceforge
> archives don't store large mails. Could you please forward it to me?

I can send you the patch against the current tree (I've already merged it) a bit later.

juergen
---
[e-mail]