On 16/08/13 14:46, Tae Wong wrote:> The AUTHORS file have all developers from the GIT log which were
sorted on their first names.
This patch will switch the sort order from first to last names.
This isn't how the AUTHORS file is generated.
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commit/5da31c8817293ff98b4defceb962f7d...
Wow! It is sorted on the first names, not on the last names...
You want to apply the patch. When you sort developers in alphabetical order, you must choose first names or last names.
You want to sort it by last names.
This patch contains several names with particles (de Saedeleer, Van Assche...) sorted in the last names by case-insensitive.
Tae Wong seotaewong40@gmail.com writes:
Wow! It is sorted on the first names, not on the last names...
You want to apply the patch. When you sort developers in alphabetical order, you must choose first names or last names.
It's autogenerated, so it's simply sorted textually. Feel free to provide a script that sorts by last name.
Julliard said that it should feel free to provide a script that sorts by last name.
You want to do this.
On 08/16/2013 04:42 PM, Tae Wong wrote:
Julliard said that it should feel free to provide a script that sorts by last name.
You want to do this.
Careful. It is a trap. He is fine with it if it is done *right*. Figuring out what the last name is is a hard problem.
bye michael
In the GIT tree, the AUTHORS file is sorted on first names.
On 08/16/2013 05:40 PM, Tae Wong wrote:
In the GIT tree, the AUTHORS file is sorted on first names.
Wrong. It is sorted by the text line. The first word on the line can be the first or lastname, depending what the author used.
bye michael
Older revisions sort them by last name instead of text line.
Your file contains all of the names sorted on last name.
The current revision contains all names sorted in first name, not last name.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Tae Wong seotaewong40@gmail.com wrote:
Older revisions sort them by last name instead of text line.
Your file contains all of the names sorted on last name.
The current revision contains all names sorted in first name, not last name.
The old revisions were updated manually. The current revision is updated automatically from git "committer information" (e.g. 'user.name' config variable , and most people happen to set it to "firstname family_name"
You have to manually update it by adding all authors from the GIT log.
The attachment is here at first message.
On 08/16/2013 09:33 PM, Tae Wong wrote:
You have to manually update it by adding all authors from the GIT log.
The attachment is here at first message.
That one you did is not correct either: - I see some Spanish "double" last names sorted by the 2nd one instead of the first. - In Dutch the "van" is not part of last name so you cannot sort those under "V"
I'm sure there is more of that in other languages. Like I said this is not a trivial problem. And not a problem that can be automated thus not sustainable long term. There's a reason git opts to sort the text lines.
bye michael
Particles "van" and "de" can be parts of last name for non-Dutch persons.
On 8/17/13, Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/16/2013 09:33 PM, Tae Wong wrote:
You have to manually update it by adding all authors from the GIT log.
The attachment is here at first message.
That one you did is not correct either:
- I see some Spanish "double" last names sorted by the 2nd one instead of the first.
- In Dutch the "van" is not part of last name so you cannot sort those under "V"
I'm sure there is more of that in other languages. Like I said this is not a trivial problem. And not a problem that can be automated thus not sustainable long term. There's a reason git opts to sort the text lines.
bye michael
This is clearly going nowhere.
Non-Dutch names starting with a last name of van can be placed under v and d can be placed under d.
Non-Dutch names like Van Buggenhaut can be placed under V instead.