Hi List,
As previously noted in list, regedit delete patch is accepted. I think next I will try to implement regedit key rename support, and treeview refresh (on the modified part of the branch). Is it ok or there is a more important work to do?
Attila
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Zimler Attila wrote:
As previously noted in list, regedit delete patch is accepted. I think next I will try to implement regedit key rename support, and treeview refresh (on the modified part of the branch). Is it ok or there is a more important work to do?
That's perfect, let's get regedit out of the way, so we can move the configuration to the registry. Now, before you do the treeview refresh, please note that for new/delete key we don't need it. What we need there (as I've already explained) is to mirror the operations directly on the treeview.
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Zimler Attila wrote:
As previously noted in list, regedit delete patch is accepted. I think next I will try to implement regedit key rename support, and treeview refresh (on the modified part of the branch). Is it ok or there is a more important work to do?
That's perfect, let's get regedit out of the way, so we can move the configuration to the registry. Now, before you do the treeview refresh, please note that for new/delete key we don't need it. What we need there (as I've already explained) is to mirror the operations directly on the treeview.
I meant to refresh only the modified part of the tree. This is what you meant too? Or if not could you explain it? (I remember that you sad the entire tree refresh is too slow, I don't want to do that)
Attila
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Zimler Attila wrote:
I meant to refresh only the modified part of the tree. This is what you meant too? Or if not could you explain it?
Well, what I mean is when we add a new key into the regisry, we should siply add the corresponding item into the treeview. Similarly, when we delete a key from the registry, we should delete the corresponding item from the treeview. No refresh required.
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Zimler Attila wrote:
I meant to refresh only the modified part of the tree. This is what you meant too? Or if not could you explain it?
Well, what I mean is when we add a new key into the regisry, we should siply add the corresponding item into the treeview. Similarly, when we delete a key from the registry, we should delete the corresponding item from the treeview. No refresh required.
I thought this :) Sorry for my english knowlegde :) So if I do this, that will be good?
Attila
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Zimler Attila wrote:
So if I do this, that will be good?
Yes, so I hope! :)))
"Zimler" == Zimler Attila hijaszu@hlfslinux.hu writes:
Zimler> Hi List, As previously noted in list, regedit delete patch is Zimler> accepted. I think next I will try to implement regedit key Zimler> rename support, and treeview refresh (on the modified part of Zimler> the branch). Is it ok or there is a more important work to do?
The work you like to do and you have incentive to do is important...
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Uwe Bonnes -
Zimler Attila