Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com writes:
Last time I submitted this (pretty trivial) patch, it got ignored.
What makes you think this is necessary? Did you test it?
2009/7/2 Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org:
Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com writes:
Last time I submitted this (pretty trivial) patch, it got ignored.
What makes you think this is necessary?
Well, every other MESSAGE trace I found (even in this very file) contained a terminal '\n' (eg on line 1093), and it was followed by the same "instruction" (ExitProcess)
1092 /* args 1 and 2 are --app-name full_path */ 1093 MESSAGE( "wine: could not run %s: 16-bit/DOS support missing\n", 1094 debugstr_w(__wine_main_wargv[3]) ); 1095 ExitProcess( ERROR_BAD_EXE_FORMAT ); 1096 } 1097 } 1098 FormatMessageA( FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM, NULL, error, 0, msg, sizeof(msg), NULL ); 1099 MESSAGE( "wine: could not load %s: %s", debugstr_w(main_exe_name), msg ); 1100 ExitProcess( error );
+ various patches adding terminal \n for other debug classes, e.g. FIXME messages
Did you test it?
Well, I've to admit I didn't. I thought it was pretty inoffensive. But I'm quite new and still learning about Wine's debugging stuff... (and Wine in general) so sorry for the non-test
Frédéric