Re: [PATCH] kernel32: Clamp maximum console window size to screen buffer size.

[Sebastian Lackner]

On 06.01.2016 05:26, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> From: Sebastian Lackner
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh McMaster
>
> dlls/kernel32/console.c       | 4 ++--
>  dlls/kernel32/tests/console.c | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks for adding your sign-off. Please note that there is no need to resend the
patch itself, if you don't do any changes. A mail just with "Signed-off-by: ..."
as reply to [e-mail] is sufficient, and makes it easier to review.

[PATCH] kernel32: Clamp maximum console window size to screen buffer size.

[Hugh McMaster]

On Wednesday, 6 Jan 2016 05:34:55 +0100, Sebastian Lackner wrote:
> On 06.01.2016 05:26, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Lackner
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner 
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh McMaster
> >
> > dlls/kernel32/console.c | 4 ++--
> > dlls/kernel32/tests/console.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for adding your sign-off. Please note that there is no need to resend the
> patch itself, if you don't do any changes. A mail just with "Signed-off-by: ..."
> as reply to [e-mail] is sufficient, and makes it easier to review.

Sorry. I wasn't certain how to generate the sign-off email. Is it done throught git or a copy-paste of the patch header?

[PATCH] kernel32: Clamp maximum console window size to screen buffer size.

[Sebastian Lackner]

On 06.01.2016 05:47, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 Jan 2016 05:34:55 +0100, Sebastian Lackner wrote:
> > On 06.01.2016 05:26, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > > From: Sebastian Lackner
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hugh McMaster
> > >
> > > dlls/kernel32/console.c | 4 ++--
> > > dlls/kernel32/tests/console.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks for adding your sign-off. Please note that there is no need to resend the
> > patch itself, if you don't do any changes. A mail just with "Signed-off-by: ..."
> > as reply to [e-mail] is sufficient, and makes it easier to review.
>
> Sorry. I wasn't certain how to generate the sign-off email. Is it done throught git or a copy-paste of the patch header?

No problem. I'm not aware of a way to send such a mail with git, the easiest way is
probably just to send a email with "Signed-off-by:..." using a mail client of your choice.