Re: Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'

[James Mckenzie]

Juan Lang  on Aug 9, 2008 6:41 PM wrote about Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do' in reply to James McKenzie's question on this subject.
> Hi James,
> > Title states it all.  I would like to compile tests to run against WindowsXP to see if the test will function.  Could I un'to-do' this test and compile it with MinGW?
>
> todo_wine tests are always run, whether or not the todo_wine flag is
> there.  The only difference is how the results are interpreted:  if
> running on Wine (which the standalone tests assume they are not), the
> test is assumed to fail, and an error reported if the test does not
> fail as expected on Wine.  If not running on Wine, they run as normal.

Thank you for the clarification.  Thus, I can run the pre-built executable on WindowsXP and there should be no richedit errors, correct?

James McKenzie

Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'

[Juan Lang]

> Thank you for the clarification.  Thus, I can run the pre-built executable on WindowsXP and there should be no richedit errors, correct?

That's the theory :)  The test don't run without error on my XP system, so YMMV.
--Juan