Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de wrote:
This affects the Bg, Cs, Da, Eo, Fi, Hu, Sk, Tr and Wa translations.
It's better to have it, even not translated. String resources should be fully filled up. Why do remove this one and leave the others?
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de wrote:
This affects the Bg, Cs, Da, Eo, Fi, Hu, Sk, Tr and Wa translations.
It's better to have it, even not translated. String resources should be fully filled up. Why do remove this one and leave the others?
It's actually a full resource. It just happens to be listed in the same STRINGTABLE.