On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Richard Cohen wrote:
...rather than adding -L<libpath> to both the DLLs and static libraries No functional changes.
I'm not sure this is correct, as the order of -L and -l may be significant. That is to say, if I do
-LdirA -la -LdirB -lb
then the system will search for a only in A, not in B, which is not the case if I do:
-LdirA -LdirB -la -lb
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Richard Cohen wrote:
...rather than adding -L<libpath> to both the DLLs and static libraries No functional changes.
I'm not sure this is correct, as the order of -L and -l may be significant. That is to say, if I do
-LdirA -la -LdirB -lb
then the system will search for a only in A, not in B, which is not the case if I do:
-LdirA -LdirB -la -lb
Yes, you're right - it is a bugfix -
-LdirA -la -LdirB -lb
and
-LdirA -LdirB -la -lb
should mean exactly the same.
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Richard Cohen