Signed-off-by: Józef Kucia jkucia@codeweavers.com ---
Would it make sense to wire up other _o__ functions instead of adding them on case by case basis?
--- .../api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0.spec | 2 +- dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0.spec b/dlls/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0.spec index 7a9ccfa7faf5..f010434a8585 100644 --- a/dlls/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0.spec +++ b/dlls/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0/api-ms-win-crt-private-l1-1-0.spec @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ @ stub _o__strerror @ stub _o__strerror_s @ stub _o__strftime_l -@ stub _o__stricmp +@ cdecl _o__stricmp(str str) ucrtbase._o__stricmp @ stub _o__stricmp_l @ stub _o__stricoll @ stub _o__stricoll_l diff --git a/dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec b/dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec index 441ef708e5bf..35727fd8633f 100644 --- a/dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec +++ b/dlls/ucrtbase/ucrtbase.spec @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ @ stub _o__strerror @ stub _o__strerror_s @ stub _o__strftime_l -@ stub _o__stricmp +@ cdecl _o__stricmp(str str) MSVCRT__stricmp @ stub _o__stricmp_l @ stub _o__stricoll @ stub _o__stricoll_l
On 6/4/19 3:18 PM, Józef Kucia wrote:
Would it make sense to wire up other _o__ functions instead of adding them on case by case basis?
We still don't know why the functions were introduced. Taking into account that there are multiple applications that are happy with calling functions without _o__ prefix I'm not against such change.
Thanks, Piotr
-
Józef Kucia -
Piotr Caban -
Piotr Caban