I see this patch was included http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/05/0258.html http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/05/0312.html
I apologise if it was not clear but the patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/05/0241.html should be applied first, which includes the neccessary header files.
Regards,
Yorick Hardy.
------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using MetroWEB's WebMail service. http://www.metroweb.co.za/ - full access for only R59
yh@metroweb.co.za writes:
I see this patch was included http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/05/0258.html http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/05/0312.html
I apologise if it was not clear but the patch http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/05/0241.html should be applied first, which includes the neccessary header files.
I thought I applied it, what did I do wrong?