I keep running into apps that won't run without richedit20.dll, yet I can't see any mention of that DLL in the wine 0.9 or wine 1.0 tasklists. Surely it's important enough to merit at least a mention in the wine 1.0 tasklist? - Dan
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:47:44 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
I keep running into apps that won't run without richedit20.dll, yet I can't see any mention of that DLL in the wine 0.9 or wine 1.0 tasklists. Surely it's important enough to merit at least a mention in the wine 1.0 tasklist?
- Dan
Nooooooooo, Wine 1.0 is ethereal enough as it is. The last thing we need is to be piling even more work onto it :) 0.9 has already suffered serious feature creep it seems, how did the WM rewrite get in there? 1.0 should be about libwine API stability IMHO, there will always be new DLLs that can be added.
Having said that I expect it would not be too hard to write a riched20.dll, I think it mostly forwards/wraps to our current implementation. The richedit is a huge bag of pain though as especially the later versions are basically miniature word processors. Currently we bodge the lack of this badly. We're going to need to look at this at some point.
thanks -mike
Hi Dan, --- Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
I keep running into apps that won't run without richedit20.dll, yet I can't see any mention of that DLL in the wine 0.9 or wine 1.0 tasklists. Surely it's important enough to merit at least a mention in the wine 1.0 tasklist?
I have been thinking about creating a stub recently for this as we have the same problem in ReactOS. Richedit20 is a lot more advanced than the standard richedit (which we have hardly anything of) but I guess we could do the same thing we do now and make it a dummy wrapper around the edit control.
Thanks Steven
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Steven Edwards wrote:
I keep running into apps that won't run without richedit20.dll, yet I can't see any mention of that DLL in the wine 0.9 or wine 1.0 tasklists. Surely it's important enough to merit at least a mention in the wine 1.0 tasklist?
I have been thinking about creating a stub recently for this as we have the same problem in ReactOS. Richedit20 is a lot more advanced than the standard richedit (which we have hardly anything of) but I guess we could do the same thing we do now and make it a dummy wrapper around the edit control.
I guess it depends. Is it better for an app to load and look like crap (e.g. the help screen in http://www.grc.com/wizmo/wizmo.htm ), or to refuse to load? I guess I vote for "looks like crap". Please keep us posted on your efforts so we don't both end up writing that dummy wrapper... - Dan