People,
I've added a small section describing a few criteria for a good screenshot. Check it out at:
http://www.dssd.ca/wine/Wine-0.9-TODO.html#screenshots
Now, if you feel like doing screenshots, please forward them to:
Brian Vincent vinn@theshell.com
how's collecting them.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
People,
I've added a small section describing a few criteria for a good screenshot. Check it out at:
Let me just add a few recommendations:
* you say big screenshots are bad which I mostly agree with. If a standard size were to be decided upon I would rather vote for 1024x768 than for 800x600. However that's not my point here. My point is that one should not take a screenshot of 1600x1200 and scale it to 800x600. This makes the fonts unreadable as is shown by your last screenshot (http://www.dssd.ca/wine/wine-ss-ok-small.png). Instead I would recommend to start a VNC server or a second X session with the right resolution and take a screenshot of that.
* the second recommendation would be to make sure it shows nice fonts. So install the fonts from http://sourceforge.net/projects/corefonts/ and make sure you have a FreeType library with hinting (or use CrossOver Office ;-).
* if you take the full desktop, then avoid fancy backgrounds. The best would be to use the distribution's default look and feel to make it more recongnizable.
Finally I'm not too hot on systematically taking a screenshot of a full desktop. If the screenshot is to go in the application database then I think taking just the application window is enough. We also need screenshots of full desktops but not that many. In some cases a partial desktop could be enough, especially if the application window is small (CD players, Trillian, etc).
Francois Gouget wrote:
Finally I'm not too hot on systematically taking a screenshot of a full desktop. If the screenshot is to go in the application database then I think taking just the application window is enough. We also need screenshots of full desktops but not that many. In some cases a partial desktop could be enough, especially if the application window is small (CD players, Trillian, etc).
I think people tend to take full screens because they think that otherwise noone will believe this is, indeed, Unix running the app.
Sh.
On November 13, 2002 01:19 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
Thanks for your input. I've updated the section accordingly, please check it out. I am still missing a *good* example shot, that illustrates all the points we are making. Help with this one is appreciated.
If a standard size were to be decided upon I would rather vote for 1024x768 than for 800x600.
*I* much prefer 1024x768 myself, as I run in 1600x1200. But according to most polls (Slashdot, etc.), most people still run 1024x768, and at that resolution, it takes scrolling to see a 1024x768 screenshot... And that blows chunks, really. So 800x600 seems to be a good compromise.
If the screenshot is to go in the application database then I think taking just the application window is enough.
I'm not sure about this. In fact, I think we _have_ to have a bit of desktop. If you want just screenshots of the app, click on the link that takes you to it's homepage, you'll find plenty there. We are trying to showcase *Wine*. Wine is the glue between the app, and Linux, and you need both to show that the glue works...