Re: USER32: Hide cursor when calling SetCursor with NULL HCURSOR

[Andreas Mohr]

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, Justin Chevrier wrote:
> Changelog:
> Hide cursor if SetCursor is called with a NULL HCURSOR

Which obviously implies the question:
What if the program does a SetCursor(something) later? Should it then re-show a
cursor previously hidden by a NULL handle? And if so, does Wine handle that
re-showing properly?
I'd better have a program with duplicate cursor than one without any cursor any
more at all ;)

Andreas

USER32: Hide cursor when calling SetCursor with NULL HCURSOR

[Justin Chevrier]

Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, Justin Chevrier wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > Hide cursor if SetCursor is called with a NULL HCURSOR
>
> Which obviously implies the question:
> What if the program does a SetCursor(something) later? Should it then re-show a
> cursor previously hidden by a NULL handle? And if so, does Wine handle that
> re-showing properly?
> I'd better have a program with duplicate cursor than one without any cursor any
> more at all ;)
>
> Andreas

I agree completely, this is not something we want to mess up and leave 
the user with no cursor. It also seems
that Windows returns a handle to the current cursor before it hides it, 
whereas I'm just returning 0 right now.
I need to write a more in depth test program to find the correct 
behaviour. I will do some more research and
testing before I resubmit.
Thanks for the feedback!

Justin