Bugzilla attachment links arriving with &action=edit

[Bruno Jesus]

Hi all, since the update yesterday all links in emails received from
the bugzilla have the action=edit so it's not no longer possible to
directly open the attachements. Examples:

--- Comment #8 from The Source  ---
Created attachment 46837
  --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=46837&action=edit
Launcher log (local.log)

--- Comment #1 from Bruno Jesus  ---
Created attachment 46835
  --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=46835&action=edit
standard output

--- Comment #3 from Travis Greenman <[e-mail]
>

Created attachment 46833
  --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=46833&action=edit
Console output, with gl error and nvidia-smi output.

Regards,
Bruno

[Alexandre Julliard]

Bruno Jesus  writes:
> Hi all, since the update yesterday all links in emails received from
> the bugzilla have the action=edit so it's not no longer possible to
> directly open the attachements. Examples:

Apparently it's a Bugzilla feature:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658547

It could certainly be reverted if people don't like it.

[Bruno Jesus]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> Bruno Jesus  writes:
> > Hi all, since the update yesterday all links in emails received from
> > the bugzilla have the action=edit so it's not no longer possible to
> > directly open the attachements. Examples:
>
> Apparently it's a Bugzilla feature:
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658547
>
> It could certainly be reverted if people don't like it.

Thanks, if I'm the only one complaining I think I can get used to that.
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> [e-mail]

Bruno

[Frédéric Delanoy]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Bruno Jesus  wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > Bruno Jesus  writes:
> > > Hi all, since the update yesterday all links in emails received from
> > > the bugzilla have the action=edit so it's not no longer possible to
> > > directly open the attachements. Examples:
> >
> > Apparently it's a Bugzilla feature:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658547
> >
> > It could certainly be reverted if people don't like it.
>
> Thanks, if I'm the only one complaining I think I can get used to that.
> > --
> > Alexandre Julliard
> > [e-mail]
>
> Bruno

Well that's rather annoying for sure. The defaut "view mode" show be
"view" not "edit" IMHO.

[Tae Wong]

All Gmane sites load slow for maintenance.

There's a new FreeDesktop Bugzilla account created using the Gmail address.

Mozilla Bugzilla account (seotaewong40) has been suspended.

[Austin English]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Frédéric Delanoy
 wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Bruno Jesus  wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > > Bruno Jesus  writes:
> > > > Hi all, since the update yesterday all links in emails received from
> > > > the bugzilla have the action=edit so it's not no longer possible to
> > > > directly open the attachements. Examples:
> > >
> > > Apparently it's a Bugzilla feature:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658547
> > >
> > > It could certainly be reverted if people don't like it.
> >
> > Thanks, if I'm the only one complaining I think I can get used to that.
> > > --
> > > Alexandre Julliard
> > > [e-mail]
> >
> > Bruno
>
> Well that's rather annoying for sure. The defaut "view mode" show be
> "view" not "edit" IMHO.
>
> --
> Frédéric Delanoy

I prefer view mode as well.

[Henri Verbeet]

Me too.

[David Quintana (gigaherz)]

The comments at the bug explain why edit was chosen over view mode.

On 12 December 2013 20:26, Henri Verbeet  wrote:
> Me too.

[Bruno Jesus]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:40 PM, David Quintana (gigaherz)
 wrote:
> The comments at the bug explain why edit was chosen over view mode.

Like this one:
"I'm also not sure why we changed this rather broadly-used behavior on
the request of a single user"

lol

[Michael Stefaniuc]

On 12/12/2013 08:40 PM, David Quintana (gigaherz) wrote:
> The comments at the bug explain why edit was chosen over view mode.

As a generic solution that might be valid for upstream. But if all that
is done is to "view" the attachment than the generic "edit" mode is just
an additional useless click.

I've used the URL to automatically download and parse the attachement so
+1 from my side to go back to the view mode.
> On 12 December 2013 20:26, Henri Verbeet  wrote:
> > Me too.

bye
    michael

[Alexandre Julliard]

Michael Stefaniuc  writes:
> On 12/12/2013 08:40 PM, David Quintana (gigaherz) wrote:
> > The comments at the bug explain why edit was chosen over view mode.
>
> As a generic solution that might be valid for upstream. But if all that
> is done is to "view" the attachment than the generic "edit" mode is just
> an additional useless click.
>
> I've used the URL to automatically download and parse the attachement so
> +1 from my side to go back to the view mode.

I've reverted it.

[Henri Verbeet]

On 12 December 2013 20:40, David Quintana (gigaherz)  wrote:
> The comments at the bug explain why edit was chosen over view mode.

It sort of does, but personally I pretty much never want to edit
attachments, and I don't find the "diff" view all that helpful. So in
practice I just always want view mode. Apparently I'm not alone in
that.