IE4 support for msxml

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

Hi,

Are we supporting IE4?
There are some changes in the interfaces for msxml and also there are
changes in guids in the subsequent versions.

How to handle ie4 finterface changes in msxml.idl?

Thanks,
Vijay

[Mike McCormack]

Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> Are we supporting IE4?
> There are some changes in the interfaces for msxml and also there are
> changes in guids in the subsequent versions.
>
> How to handle ie4 finterface changes in msxml.idl?

COM gives different interfaces different IIDs, so there shouldn't be any 
problem defining multiple interfaces, they just have different IIDs and 
names.

If you're going to choose an XML version to implement, I'd start with 
that defined by msxml3.

Mike

[Vijay Kiran Kamuju]

Ok,

for backward compatibility, i would be defining the interfaces.
as for iid's i would be going for msxml3 implementation.

Are there any suggestions for my sample stub implementation?

Thanks,
 Vijay

On 7/1/05, Mike McCormack  wrote:
> Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > Are we supporting IE4?
> > There are some changes in the interfaces for msxml and also there are
> > changes in guids in the subsequent versions.
> >
> > How to handle ie4 finterface changes in msxml.idl?
>
> COM gives different interfaces different IIDs, so there shouldn't be any
> problem defining multiple interfaces, they just have different IIDs and
> names.
>
> If you're going to choose an XML version to implement, I'd start with
> that defined by msxml3.
>
> Mike

[Mike McCormack]

Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> for backward compatibility, i would be defining the interfaces.
> as for iid's i would be going for msxml3 implementation.

Great!
> Are there any suggestions for my sample stub implementation?

Well, there's a few different styles used in Wine.  I've been working on 
  the code that implements the CLSID_ShellLink object 
(dlls/shell32/shelllink.c) so that more or less reflects the way I like 
it done.

Mike