could someone with a Win98 box test the attached test (it's a diff to dlls/kernel/tests/comm.c) ? the test passes on XP, I want to be sure it does as well on Win9x before I remove the offending code
TIA
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 1:51:45 PM, Eric Pouech wrote:
could someone with a Win98 box test the attached test (it's a diff to dlls/kernel/tests/comm.c) ? the test passes on XP, I want to be sure it does as well on Win9x before I remove the offending code
TIA
Ran on win98 in vmware:
L:\wine\crosstests>kernel32_crosstest.exe comm comm.c:677:Found Com port COM1. Connected devices may disturbe results comm.c:695:GetCommModemStatus returned 0x000000b0->MS_RLSD_ON MS_DSR_ON MS_CTS_ON comm.c:745:test_waittxempty comm.c:770:WriteFile succeeded, took 0 ms to write 17 Bytes at 150 Baud comm.c:784:WaitCommEvent for EV_TXEMPTY took 0 ms comm.c:677:Found Com port COM1. Connected devices may disturbe results comm.c:804:test_ClearCommErrors done comm.c:677:Found Com port COM1. Connected devices may disturbe results comm.c:677:Found Com port COM1. Connected devices may disturbe results comm.c:1295:test_AbortWaitCts timeout 500 handle 0x00000014 comm.c:1265: Changing CommMask on the fly for handle 00000014 after timeout 500 comm.c:1303:Thread created comm.c:1313:Success 0x00000000 err 0x000003e5 evtmask 0x00000000 comm.c:1315:overlapped WriteCommEvent returned. comm.c:1322:Success 0x00000001 err 0x000003e5 evtmask 0x00000000 diff1 0, diff2502 comm.c:1269:comm: 5510 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 0 failures.
-
Eric Pouech -
Vitaliy Margolen