Re: [1/2] user32/tests: Test DialogBoxParam using a dialog template with invalid control class.
On 18.08.2017 13:41, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de
dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c | 6 ++++++ dlls/user32/tests/resource.rc | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
There is no need to resubmit, the patches are exactly identical to what Andrew submitted. Also, why the hell is there my sign-off? It is apparently not fine for you when Andrew wants to take responsiblity for your patches, but you expect me to take responsibility for it, without confirming that I'm fine with it first? For other people I would now start to explain that Wine Staging also accepts workarounds and imperfect patches, and that the addition to Wine Staging does not imply my sign-off, but I'm pretty sure you are well aware of it...
Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de wrote:
On 18.08.2017 13:41, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de
dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c | 6 ++++++ dlls/user32/tests/resource.rc | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
There is no need to resubmit, the patches are exactly identical to what Andrew submitted. Also, why the hell is there my sign-off? It is apparently not fine for you when Andrew wants to take responsiblity for your patches, but you expect me to take responsibility for it, without confirming that I'm fine with it first? For other people I would now start to explain that Wine Staging also accepts workarounds and imperfect patches, and that the addition to Wine Staging does not imply my sign-off, but I'm pretty sure you are well aware of it...
I'm sorry about adding your sign-off, probably I should have longer waiting for your reply before submitting, and apparently I was too optimistic about implicit sign-off of the wine-staging maintainer when adding the patches...
-
Dmitry Timoshkov -
Sebastian Lackner