I've been looking at this function, and I am starting to suspect we have the wrong definition of CSIDL_FOLDER_MASK (currently 0x00ff). What I've been seeing (eg. installing MS Office 97) seems to imply that only the lower 6 bits, rather than 8, are related to the folder, and the others are something else. Does anyone else think that the mask should be 0x003f?
regards Chris
_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
"Chris Green" chris_e_green@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been looking at this function, and I am starting to suspect we have the wrong definition of CSIDL_FOLDER_MASK (currently 0x00ff). What I've been seeing (eg. installing MS Office 97) seems to imply that only the lower 6 bits, rather than 8, are related to the folder, and the others are something else. Does anyone else think that the mask should be 0x003f?
Yes, 0x3f seems to be reasonable according to ShlObj.h from the Platform SDK.
-- Dmitry.
-
Chris Green -
Dmitry Timoshkov