[PATCH] libport: Add wine_call_on_stack_obsolete fallback for other architectures

[André Hentschel]

Signed-off-by: André Hentschel 
---
 libs/wine/port.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libs/wine/port.c b/libs/wine/port.c
index 618b280881e..0e7dcc88d91 100644
--- a/libs/wine/port.c
+++ b/libs/wine/port.c
@@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( wine_call_on_stack_obsolete,
                    "ldr x19, [sp,#16]\n\t"           /* restore register from stack */
                    "ldp x29, x30, [sp],#32\n\t"      /* restore return address */
                    "ret")                            /* return */
+#else
+int wine_call_on_stack_obsolete( int (*func)(void *), void *arg, void *stack )
+{
+    return 0;
+}
 #endif

/***********************************************************************

[Alexandre Julliard]

André Hentschel  writes:
> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel
>
> libs/wine/port.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Other architectures don't need to worry about backwards compatibility.

[André Hentschel]

Am 10.08.20 um 22:16 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel  writes:
> > Signed-off-by: André Hentschel
> >
> > libs/wine/port.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> Other architectures don't need to worry about backwards compatibility.

without the libport patch I get on ppc64le:
/usr/bin/ld: libwine.so.1.0: no symbol version section for versioned symbol `wine_call_on_stack@WINE_1.0'

I thought this would be an easy fix. What is your suggestion?