Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This patch removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to version 1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the registry) or are things supposed to happen automagically?
My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.
Normally apps take the value of the DISPLAY environment variable. If that isn't set from within X your system is hosed, no two ways about it...
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 14:39, Sami Aario wrote:
Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This patch removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to version 1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the registry) or are things supposed to happen automagically?
My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.
Sami Aario wrote:
Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This patch removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to version 1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the registry) or are things supposed to happen automagically?
My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.
Is it possible that your DISPLAY environment variable is not set? What do you get when you do (in the shell) "echo $DISPLAY"?
Shachar
Sami Aario wrote:
Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This
patch
removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to
version
1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the
registry)
or are things supposed to happen automagically?
My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.
Is it possible that your DISPLAY environment variable is not set? What do you get when you do (in the shell) "echo $DISPLAY"?
I get an empty string. So DISPLAY is not set... A platform dependent thing?
Shachar
-- Shachar Shemesh Open Source integration & consulting Home page & resume - http://www.shemesh.biz/
Sami Aario wrote:
Sami Aario wrote:
Hi list,
Version 1.83 of dlls/x11drv/x11drv_main.c does not work for me. This
patch
removes the Display option in the config file, and now I get this error message: "x11drv: Can't open display: " (and no display name given). I've had to revert to
version
1.81.
Is the display name supposed to be given somewhere else (e.g. the
registry)
or are things supposed to happen automagically?
My system is a debian woody, and XFree86 -version reports 4.1.0.1.
Is it possible that your DISPLAY environment variable is not set? What do you get when you do (in the shell) "echo $DISPLAY"?
I get an empty string. So DISPLAY is not set... A platform dependent thing?
No, I don't think it is. X applications (and that's what Wine is) get the display to you from the DISPLAY environment variables. Does other X applications work for you? Are you running an X server at all? What did the "display" option in your config file used to say?
Try setting the DISPLAY environment variable to the same value, and see if that solves your problem. Again, I'm suprised that other X application do not exhibit the same problem on your setup.
Shachar
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shachar Shemesh" wine-devel@shemesh.biz To: "Sami Aario" sami.aario@surfeu.fi Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 5:28 PM Subject: Re: Problems with x11drv_main.c version 1.83
No, I don't think it is. X applications (and that's what Wine is) get the display to you from the DISPLAY environment variables. Does other X applications work for you? Are you running an X server at all? What did the "display" option in your config file used to say?
Oh, to answer your questions, yes (though I haven't tried launching from the console), yes, and "Display" = ":0.0".