I prefer the attaching text method, to be *sure* the patch is not mangled, but that *anyone* can read it (e.g. I may want to review a patch from a location that does not offer me gzip or whatever the compression scheme de jour is). Also, have you tried adjusting the "Screen Width" settings in "General Preferences" in Yahoo Mail?
-- Jeff S
From: Andriy Palamarchuk apa3a@yahoo.com To: dimi@bigfoot.com, Wine Devel wine-devel@winehq.com Subject: Re: patches policy Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
--- "Dimitrie O. Paun" dpaun@rogers.com wrote:
Hi all,
There is something concerning submitting patches that bothers me to no end: inlining vs. attaching them.
[skipped]
I have to attach the patches :-( because I use Yahoo online mail client and it wraps long lines. I also usually compress patches with size >= 20-30kb to save everybody's bandwith.
It is good idea to add these recommendations to the Starter's guide, even if we are not going to enforce them.
Andriy, Boston, MA
_________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
--- Jeff Smith whydoubt@hotmail.com wrote:
I prefer the attaching text method, to be *sure* the patch is not mangled, but that *anyone* can read it (e.g. I may want to review a patch from a location that does not offer me gzip or whatever the compression scheme de jour is). Also, have you tried adjusting the "Screen Width" settings in "General Preferences" in Yahoo Mail?
Jeff, thank you for the advice. Don't want to give Yahoo a chance to corrupt the patch. I also don't like idea of cutting and pasting the patches.
Andriy
Boston, MA, USA
__________________________________________________ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute