Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com wrote:
/* Make sure we can convert to the requested format. */
- if (flags & ImageLockModeRead)
- if ((flags & ImageLockModeRead) || (bitmap->image.flags & ImageFlagsReadOnly))
Is there a test for this behaviour?
On 09/02/17 02:16, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com wrote:
/* Make sure we can convert to the requested format. */
- if (flags & ImageLockModeRead)
- if ((flags & ImageLockModeRead) || (bitmap->image.flags & ImageFlagsReadOnly))
Is there a test for this behaviour?
It's not possible to test exactly this flag because we can't set them by hand (and none of the bitmap constructors sets only it). I'm testing an image with this flag in patch 7.
Thanks, Piotr
Piotr Caban piotr.caban@gmail.com wrote:
/* Make sure we can convert to the requested format. */
- if (flags & ImageLockModeRead)
- if ((flags & ImageLockModeRead) || (bitmap->image.flags & ImageFlagsReadOnly))
Is there a test for this behaviour?
It's not possible to test exactly this flag because we can't set them by hand (and none of the bitmap constructors sets only it). I'm testing an image with this flag in patch 7.
As far as I can see the test in patch 7 shows that GdipCreateHBITMAPFromBitmap() should not use GdipBitmapLockBits() internally, and the patch 6 fixes this case. Adding the check above is not justified neither by tests nor by an explanation.
Hi Dmitry,
On 10/02/17 02:06, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban piotr.caban@gmail.com wrote:
/* Make sure we can convert to the requested format. */
- if (flags & ImageLockModeRead)
- if ((flags & ImageLockModeRead) || (bitmap->image.flags & ImageFlagsReadOnly))
Is there a test for this behaviour?
It's not possible to test exactly this flag because we can't set them by hand (and none of the bitmap constructors sets only it). I'm testing an image with this flag in patch 7.
As far as I can see the test in patch 7 shows that GdipCreateHBITMAPFromBitmap() should not use GdipBitmapLockBits() internally, and the patch 6 fixes this case. Adding the check above is not justified neither by tests nor by an explanation.
I'll add more tests for this case.
Thanks, Piotr