Looks like Jacek and Gentoo have the magic combination. It's passed 4 days in a row: http://test.winehq.org/data/ae3e768a2e1f9c21b355798c8fbf473db3d83434/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/bf640445c748b0588616da201e8ff8f3b1c778e9/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/780f9b3b4fe8ff17784860a2a65b4ecab268436a/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/745a50c9dbb03d37db58ff53136e93f00943bc0d/wine_jc...
now let's see if we can spread the love to someone else :-).
Am 08.02.2011 08:14, schrieb Austin English:
Looks like Jacek and Gentoo have the magic combination. It's passed 4 days in a row: http://test.winehq.org/data/ae3e768a2e1f9c21b355798c8fbf473db3d83434/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/bf640445c748b0588616da201e8ff8f3b1c778e9/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/780f9b3b4fe8ff17784860a2a65b4ecab268436a/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/745a50c9dbb03d37db58ff53136e93f00943bc0d/wine_jc...
now let's see if we can spread the love to someone else :-).
fg-deb64-win32 once passed reliably, so we should start here. and now without the 9x stuff the result page looks better again, someone just need to fix his user32 test :)
2011/2/13 André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de:
Am 08.02.2011 08:14, schrieb Austin English:
Looks like Jacek and Gentoo have the magic combination. It's passed 4 days in a row: http://test.winehq.org/data/ae3e768a2e1f9c21b355798c8fbf473db3d83434/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/bf640445c748b0588616da201e8ff8f3b1c778e9/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/780f9b3b4fe8ff17784860a2a65b4ecab268436a/wine_jc... http://test.winehq.org/data/745a50c9dbb03d37db58ff53136e93f00943bc0d/wine_jc...
now let's see if we can spread the love to someone else :-).
fg-deb64-win32 once passed reliably, so we should start here. and now without the 9x stuff the result page looks better again, someone just need to fix his user32 test :)
Yeah, a few machines have passed reliably before. My ubuntu machine used to pass as well, and is close aside from two bugs: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20604 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25284