Re: [PATCH 04/18] inetcomm: Add self-registration code.

[Paul Vriens]

Robert Shearman wrote:
>

+static LONG recursive_delete_key(HKEY key);
+static LONG recursive_delete_keyA(HKEY base, char const *name);
+static LONG recursive_delete_keyW(HKEY base, WCHAR const *name);

We just got rid of all the self build recursive delete ones. Can you use 
RegDeleteTree[AW] (or is there a specific reason not to)?

[PATCH 04/18] inetcomm: Add self-registration code.

[Robert Shearman]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> Robert Shearman wrote:
> >
>
> +static LONG recursive_delete_key(HKEY key);
> +static LONG recursive_delete_keyA(HKEY base, char const *name);
> +static LONG recursive_delete_keyW(HKEY base, WCHAR const *name);
>
> We just got rid of all the self build recursive delete ones. Can you 
> use RegDeleteTree[AW] (or is there a specific reason not to)?

No reason, just that this code was written before the RegDeleteTree cleanup.

[PATCH 04/18] inetcomm: Add self-registration code.

[Huw Davies]

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 01:51:10PM +0000, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Paul Vriens wrote:
> > Robert Shearman wrote:
> > >
> >
> > +static LONG recursive_delete_key(HKEY key);
> > +static LONG recursive_delete_keyA(HKEY base, char const *name);
> > +static LONG recursive_delete_keyW(HKEY base, WCHAR const *name);
> >
> > We just got rid of all the self build recursive delete ones. Can you 
> > use RegDeleteTree[AW] (or is there a specific reason not to)?
>
> No reason, just that this code was written before the RegDeleteTree cleanup.

I'm about to resubmit the patchset anyway and have made this change.

Huw.