Re: [PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent

[Alexandre Julliard]

Eric Pouech  writes:
> #28185
> A+
>
> programs/uninstaller/main.c |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

I'm not sure that's a good idea. The output of uninstaller is meant to
be used by Unix apps, it's not something a user would want to display on
the console.

[PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent

[Eric Pouech]

Le 07/11/2011 14:12, Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
> Eric Pouech  writes:
> > #28185
> > A+
> >
> > programs/uninstaller/main.c |   65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >   1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> I'm not sure that's a good idea. The output of uninstaller is meant to
> be used by Unix apps, it's not something a user would want to display on
> the console.

do you consider it's the same for winepath and winetest (number 5& 6 in 
patchset) ? or shall I resubmit the remaining two ?
A+

[PATCH 3/6] [UnInstall]: No longer use unix stdio functions, but the kernel32 equivalent

[Alexandre Julliard]

Eric Pouech  writes:
> do you consider it's the same for winepath and winetest (number 5& 6
> in patchset) ? or shall I resubmit the remaining two ?

It's the same for winepath, yes. winetest is probably OK to change.