On December 9, 2002 11:26 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
Patch is relative to wine root, made with cvs diff, is this right?
Yes, and no (it's not in the right format). Please read:
http://www.winehq.org/development/#patches http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/09/0127.html
It's not inlined? Evolution seems to insist on wrapping it if I inline it. Or was there some other problem?
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:22, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On December 9, 2002 11:26 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
Patch is relative to wine root, made with cvs diff, is this right?
Yes, and no (it's not in the right format). Please read:
http://www.winehq.org/development/#patches http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2002/09/0127.html
Mike Hearn a écrit:
It's not inlined? Evolution seems to insist on wrapping it if I inline it. Or was there some other problem?
The problem is the actual format of the patch. It's not in unified format (cvs diff -u, or add diff -u to .cvsrc). With that format, it'll add some context around the modified lines, so it's easier to understand what's changed.
Vincent
-
Dimitrie O. Paun -
Mike Hearn -
Vincent Béron