Re: Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Tony Lambregts]

[e-mail] wrote:
> Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
> > I'd like to completely clarify that :
> > - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
> >
> > active by
> > the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
> > months when the action was with the raiser can be closed.
> >
> > If so, which closing code (does it matter?!)? With no changes to 
> > bugzilla I
> > would suggest an INVALID closing code with appropriate words added.
> >
> > Once agreed, we can have some fun clearing out some old rubbish. Looking
> > through the old bugs and trying to reproduce a few, there are some easily
> > recreatable basic bugs but those where there is nothing to go on 
> > really cant
> > be progressed!
>
> Well if the attached patch is OK for Jeremy then you will not need to 
> use "INVALID" and you use "ABANDONED" instead. ;^)

Jeremy committed the patch... You can now resolve a bug as "ABANDONED" :^)

--

Tony Lambregts

Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Raphael]

On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:07, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
> > > I'd like to completely clarify that :
> > > - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
> > >
> > > active by
> > > the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
> > > months when the action was with the raiser can be closed.
> > >
> > > If so, which closing code (does it matter?!)? With no changes to
> > > bugzilla I
> > > would suggest an INVALID closing code with appropriate words added.
> > >
> > > Once agreed, we can have some fun clearing out some old rubbish. Looking
> > > through the old bugs and trying to reproduce a few, there are some
> > > easily recreatable basic bugs but those where there is nothing to go on
> > > really cant
> > > be progressed!
> >
> > Well if the attached patch is OK for Jeremy then you will not need to
> > use "INVALID" and you use "ABANDONED" instead. ;^)
>
> Jeremy committed the patch... You can now resolve a bug as "ABANDONED" :^)

Hi,

it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
 - wine-directx-dmusic
 - wine-directx-dsound
 - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
 - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)

As wine-directx is too much generic
and most of errors are dsound problems

Thx

Regards,
Raphael

Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Tom Wickline]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
> - wine-directx-dmusic
> - wine-directx-dsound
> - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
> - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)

Could I also suggest....

-wine-directx-dshow
-wine-directx-dplay

Tom
> As wine-directx is too much generic
> and most of errors are dsound problems
>
> Thx
>
> Regards,
> Raphael

Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Robert Reif]

Tom Wickline wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
> > - wine-directx-dmusic
> > - wine-directx-dsound
> > - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
> > - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
>
> Could I also suggest....
>
> -wine-directx-dshow
> -wine-directx-dplay
>
> Tom
> > As wine-directx is too much generic
> > and most of errors are dsound problems
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raphael

Don't forget dinput.

Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Tony Lambregts]

Robert Reif wrote:
> Tom Wickline wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:17:28 +0100, Raphael  
> > wrote:
> > > it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
> > > - wine-directx-dmusic
> > > - wine-directx-dsound
> > > - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
> > > - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
> >
> > Could I also suggest....
> >
> > -wine-directx-dshow
> > -wine-directx-dplay
>
> Don't forget dinput.

We now have the following components for directx in bugzilla.

wine-directx  		Obsolete (Use individualized components)

There are 156 bugs that use this as a component, So there is a little janitorial 
project for assigning these to the proper subcomponent. (Any volunteers?)

wine-directx-d3d 	New DirectX code >= dx8
wine-directx-ddraw 	Old DirectX code < dx8
wine-directx-dinput 	DirectX DInput
wine-directx-dmusic 	DirectX Music
wine-directx-dplay 	DirectX DPlay
wine-directx-dshow 	DirectX DShow
wine-directx-dsound 	DirectX sound

Ifthere is anything wrong with the descriptins or you find you need additional 
components then please let me know.

http://bugs.winehq.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Wine

--

Tony Lambregts

Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Tony Lambregts]

Raphael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
> - wine-directx-dmusic
> - wine-directx-dsound
> - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
> - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)
>
> As wine-directx is too much generic
> and most of errors are dsound problems

Well I have no problem with that idea. Unless someone has a problem with that I 
will add them tomorrow.

Speak now or hold your peace.

--

Tony Lambregts.